Tag Archives: Tesco

Sir Sorrell supports data for more scientific communication

21 Dec

When Martin Sorrell speaks people listen. So a few ears perked up after he gave an interview to the Telegraph suggesting the Coalition’s austerity programme is the envy of our American cousins.

But what caught my attention was that the man in charge of communications behemoth WPP said that data is the thing that excites him most. I agree with him (not just because he heads up a company which owns a huge chunk of the industry which I hope to progress in and he’s pretty much always right anyway) because more scientific and logical thinking creates better communication.

Companies have always craved a greater understanding of consumers. Account planning in advertising was developed to give creative work more of a scientific basis. The practice is the brainchild of legendary adman Stanley Pollitt, who felt his clients deserved advertising that was less reliant on gut feeling and more on logical insights.

The use of data can be effectively used across marketing to great effect, if you know how people tick, you know how to communicate to them. Tesco’s Clubcard loyalty programme is a great example of how data about consumers can be used to obtain a detailed understanding of their behaviour. Although Tesco harvests a vast amount of data there have been very few concerns raised about privacy, this is down to the fact that the scheme is opt-in. People want to be part of the scheme and can see its benefits due to useful vouchers being sent to them.

Just as Tesco uses its data to ensure it only sends relevant vouchers to its Clubcard members, there has been a growing trend of marketers who want targeted communication. Alexia Quadrani, who covers the advertising industry for JP Morgan Chase in New York, rightly says: “To do that effectively you need the data.”

As technology has developed it has made it easier to get data, Tesco were on able to launch the Clubcard scheme after magnetic strips on cards made it cost effective to track individual’s behaviour. The Internet is now an essential part of many of our lives and it has meant there are more opportunities for our likes, dislikes and behaviour to be tracked and ana

lysed.

But this lust from marketers to gather data also raises serious concerns about privacy. Facebook has got in a world of trouble about its privacy issues. Mark Zuckerberg, in what turned out to be a massive PR gaffe, famously said ‘the age of privacy is over’. However the data from its users’ profiles is exactly the kind of stuff advertisers crave. That’s why advertising on Facebook is so powerful, as it uses people’s profile information such as their age/gender/location/likes to ensure only relevant ads are shown on people’s pages. On my Facebook page adverts include those about football, poker and things to do in London. All fairly accurate and things that would catch my attention, therefore I would be more likely to click on them. Although people have freely entered information on Facebook, there have still been various complaints about the way Facebook uses the data to sell to advertisers, many saying it is a gross invasion of privacy.

Also as more and more people get smartphones and as apps are widely downloaded and used, there has been concerns raised about how some developers are using their apps to mine consumer data. The Wall Street Journal recently broke a story about how various apps have been sending personal data – such as location, age, gender and other personal details – in order to gain a detailed analysis of people in order to sell onto marketers. The more that is known about a person the more revenue that can be generated, for example ads targeted by location bring in two to five times as much money as untargeted ads.

Marketers like targeted advertising as instead of using a megaphone tactic, shouting their message at a crowd and hoping it’ll be heard by at least some relevant people, they are getting targeted, sophisticated and their message to the right audience. Also because it’s targeted they are willing to pay for more for it, so there is a big market out there for companies that can provide information about people and their behaviour.

Some find it creepy and invasive they are receiving advertising that’s targeted and personal to them, personally I find it useful as I am increasingly seeing things that interest me. There is no point advertising a Venus razor at me – because although the lady showcasing the Greek goddess type qualities may catch my attention – as there’s no way I’ll ever buy one.

Waitrose gambles premium brand to attract price conscious shoppers

2 Oct

On the surface of it Waitrose’s latest marketing plan to match Tesco on 1000 branded goods seem a little bit strange.

The scheme has been backed up with a heavy TV, press, outdoor and email advertising campaign,  and the launch of the price match has also received a number of mentions in the media.

Waitrose has carved itself a lovely niche in the market by offering quality premium goods, which is different from the low cost strategy of Tesco and Asda.  It seems strange Waitrose wants to try and compete with the bargain supermarkets as it is already an extremely competitive end of the market; and an end that seems to demand a constant slew of the advertising in order to keep market share intact.

The timing of the price match is also bizarre. Why launch it now when the economy has recovered and not during the recession when value for money was high on the agenda? Also the thrust of this campaign is that they will match the price of Tesco, not beat it, not undercut them, not actually save anyone any money, so they are offering no unique benefit for people. It also does not match of the other several branded products that supermarkets offer.

A Waitrose shopper has been willing to pay a bit more for their weekly shop in a trade of for quality, they are the Marks and Spencer yummy mummy who are doing their big weekly shop.

So trying to position the supermarket in the same bracket as Tesco, one that is competitive on price, may also damage the brand’s reputation of quality.

However I think this campaign will work. It helps reassure existing customers they are not being ripped off by paying over the odds for the same items, and it will also help to draw in new customers as well. I can imagine this campaign has been launched after a lot of research in which the main finding was that people are intrigued by Waitrose but are put off because of the perceived high price of their goods.

But 19 years ago my mother, a regular Asda shopper, thought she would give Tesco a whirl after hearing it was a little bit better than Asda and just as cheap. So off to Tesco she went to do her regular weekly shop and to her horror she discovered that it had cost her over £10 more. She agreed that some of the goods were better, but she has never been back to Tesco to do her main shop since that day.

So the price match may work in dragging extra people in Waitrose, but once they discover that their shopping costs more the majority will soon revert back to their normal cheaper supermarket.

But a few may enjoy the experience and the food within Waitrose that they may decide to keep on shopping there. So I think this bold strategy will work for the company as it tries to snatch more market share in the ultra-competitive world of supermarket retail.

No-one likes being called lazy

20 Feb

 

 

A product that insults people may make them think twice about buying it.

 

There are many ways to insult someone, but one of the easiest ways is to call them lazy. So it seems pretty daft that a brand would insult a consumer and then expect them to buy their product.

But this is exactly what this product called ‘Very Lazy’ does – it insults people.

At first glance the product sniffs of quality. I love how the label does not take over the packaging. It lets the attractive natural colour of the produce dominate and as a result it works well.

But they have got the branding of the product so very wrong. No-one likes being called lazy. We all may be a bit lazy from time to time but who in all honestly  is proud to be called lazy. So why would a consumer want to be associated with laziness. Products are supposed to make people feel good.

I can see why such a name may work for a product like this, people have busy lives so they don’t want to come home from a long day at work and start cooking a lengthy gourmet meal. People with modern lifestyles want food that is quick and easy to make, but also is tasty and nutritious. The product tries to position itself with good food that can be made speedily and easily. But there are far more positive associations of speed and ease that could be attached to the product.

‘Very Lazy’ is a horrible name for the product. It may as well be called ‘Sloth’ or ‘Can’t be Arsed’ or ‘Idel’.

Imagine a world where Coke promoted Pepsi

30 Sep
2105363803_ddf2a246e8

A lovely view of Rochdale town centre

Think of the day if Coca-Cola advertised Pepsi on its cans, Vodaphone plugged T-Mobile’s latest new unlimited texts offer, Manchester United embossed ‘City Til I Die’ on their latest strip or Ronald McDonald handed out flyers for Burger King.

It’s pretty hard to imagine and you could argue that it would only happen in some crazy parallel advertising universe. Promoting your rivals seems bit a backwards strategy and let’s be honest its insane to even think about it, but not according to the communication crew at Rochdale council.

They have been advertising near by town centres and local markets on the back of their employee’s wage slips. Neighbouring towns, Todmorden and Hebden Bridge, have made an appearance and as they are just a short journey away should be considered fierce rivals to Rochdale’s own town centre. Although the adverts will no doubt put a few extra pennies in the council’s coffers, the possible long term damage is potentially disastrous.

For one Rochdale town centre has been going through a bit of a rough patch for the past few years, retailers have deserted the town in their droves only to be replaced with a bazaar of pound, pawn and phone shops. Town centre businesses need all the shoppers and custom they can get. So you have to wonder what the logic is behind actively encouraging people to go elsewhere. And the council is not just encouraging the general masses to go elsewhere it’s encouraging its own staff, its own representatives, the very people who are working to try and better Rochdale.

Also what kind of message does it send to council workers that their employer is promoting neighbouring shopping centres instead of its own? It almost shows a lack of loyalty and a lack of confidence in its own facilities. It is unimaginable to find ASDA promoting Tesco’s latest deals on the back of its employee’s wage slips, so why should Rochdale council promote rival markets?

This practice is inconceivable in the real world but somehow seems acceptable to communication professionals employed by Rochdale council.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 412 other followers